
USA
Chris Cadence is a pro-Black content creator who accuses Rashida Tlaib of tokenizing Black people, weaponises his platforms to smear pro-Palestine activism as performative distraction from white supremacy, and diverts focus from "Israel's" genocide to fracture solidarity.
Chris Cadence, self-described advocate for the marginalised, echoes Zionist-aligned critiques by mocking leftists who centre Palestine, framing such focus as tokenism or personality politics that absolves white supremacy while accusing Black communities of insufficient engagement
Social / Media/Influencer
Chris Cadence is a content creator who positions himself as a future Black civil rights leader and advocate for the most marginalised yet directs his platforms on TikTok, YouTube, and X toward accusing pro-Palestinian figures such as Rashida Tlaib of tokenizing Black people in order to undermine solidarity between Black liberation struggles and Palestinian resistance against ongoing genocide across Palestine whilst also erasing the existence of Afro-Palestinians.
In one documented statement Cadence criticises white leftists for making Palestine their personality to absolve white supremacy while accusing Black people of privilege and failing to donate or create awareness content. This rhetoric reframes legitimate advocacy for Palestinian rights as a colonising morality project that distracts from Black-specific issues (as if Black Palestinians are non-existent), thereby serving the Zionist strategy of dividing oppressed communities and normalising the erasure of Palestinian indigeneity.
Cadence further advances this pattern through a satirical video titled Online Leftist Application that mocks those who hate Israel, blame it for everything, call dissenters Zionist, and use Palestine to derail other discussions. By presenting concern for "Israel's" documented ethnic cleansing and apartheid as performative or divisive, Cadence contributes to the weaponisation of identity politics that protects the settler-colonial entity from accountability and discourages unified resistance.
Cadence also states that America's imperialism affects more than just Palestine and urges focus on the whole wide world rather than a few million people, framing that serves to minimise the specific mechanisms of Zionist settler-colonialism, including the Nakba's ongoing legacy of dispossession and the IOF's systematic targeting of Palestinian infrastructure, while positioning singular attention on Palestine as disproportionate or selective.
Cadence's interventions form a consistent pattern in which he leverages his pro-Black persona to attack advocates for Palestinian liberation, including through accusations of tokenism against elected officials such as Rashida Tlaib. Such behaviour normalises the dehumanisation of Palestinians as secondary to other struggles and helps manufacture consent for the continued occupation, apartheid, and genocide that have devastated Palestinian society for more than seventy-seven years.
Through these public statements Cadence participates in the broader effort to fracture international solidarity movements, ensuring that Western institutions and audiences remain insulated from the material consequences of arming and diplomatically shielding the Zionist project. His pattern of behaviour demonstrates a sustained contribution to the erasure of Palestinian political agency and the maintenance of colonial hierarchies that prioritise settler interests over indigenous sovereignty.

Silence = Complicity:
For those who have passionately spoken out against other instances of genocide and massacres, yet fall silent when it comes to the suffering endured by Palestinians, their silence becomes a glaring indictment of the value placed on Palestinian lives and perpetuates a dangerous narrative that suggests Palestinian suffering is somehow less worthy of outrage, less deserving of empathy and less human than that of others.
By choosing silence in the face of Palestinian suffering, those with influential platforms inadvertently contribute to the erasure of Palestinian voices and experiences. They perpetuate a narrative of invisibility that allows the injustices inflicted upon Palestinians to continue unabated, shielded from the spotlight of global scrutiny.
Their silence sends a chilling message of complicity to the world – one that suggests Palestinian lives are expendable, their struggles inconsequential and their humanity negotiable. It emboldens perpetrators of violence and oppression, granting them impunity under the guise of indifference.
To remain silent in the face of Palestinian suffering is to betray the very essence of activism – the relentless pursuit of justice for all, without exception or equivocation. It’s a betrayal not only of the Palestinian people but of the universal principles of human dignity and equality and instead is a tacit endorsement of the dehumanization and marginalization of an entire population.
True activism demands consistency and integrity, an unwavering commitment to speaking truth to power and standing in solidarity with the marginalized and oppressed, regardless of geography or politics.
BDS Boycott:
The BDS (Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions) movement is a global campaign which follows the worldwide boycott movement that led to the successful dismantling of apartheid in South Africa and therefore advocates for various sustained forms of boycott against Israel until it complies with international law.
Founded as a response to the rampant, ongoing and systemic dispossession, displacement, and disenfranchisement endured by generations of Palestinians, the BDS movement is in direct response to the relentless expansion of Israeli settlements, the imposition of discriminatory laws and the denial of basic rights to millions living under occupation, apartheid or in exile with no right of return.
Central to the ethos of BDS is the belief that every purchase and action carries a weighty moral responsibility. To buy goods from or actively support companies or organizations on the BDS list is to cast a vote in favor of perpetuating injustice, a tacit endorsement of the status quo of occupation and discrimination. It’s a direct violation of the collective conscience, a betrayal of the fundamental principles of human rights and dignity.
By pressuring Israel and its supporters by withdrawing support and capital, humanity aims to bring awareness to — and ultimately — end the occupation of Palestine, grant equal rights to all Palestinians and recognize the right of Palestinian refugees to return to their homes. This pressure also extends to any individuals and entities found to be complicit in the normalization, funding or support of Israel’s brutal occupation and 75+ years of ethnic cleansing of Palestinians.
Normalization:
Israel enforces normalization as a fundamental tactic of its settler-colonial regime and apartheid system, compelling the depiction of its occupation, ethnic cleansing, and genocide as everyday realities while suppressing Palestinian resistance and rights to justice, return, and liberation. Normalization portrays Israel's domination as a legitimate state worthy of standard diplomatic, economic, cultural, and academic engagements, ignoring demands for dismantling oppression and reinforcing Jewish supremacy over Indigenous Palestinian land and people. This strategy is egregious because it whitewashes the continuous Nakba, land expropriation, and systemic violence, isolating Palestinians and bolstering settler colonialism by undermining international solidarity and legitimizing illegal expansions that perpetuate genocide. [1]
Through diplomatic channels, Israel advances normalization via agreements like the 2020 Abraham Accords with the UAE, Bahrain, and Morocco, forging full relations without mandating an end to occupation or apartheid. These pacts favor economic and security benefits for authoritarian leaders while forsaking Palestinian self-determination, directly sustaining settler violence by allowing unchecked settlement growth, home demolitions, and refugee denial amid increasing trade and tourism. Such normalization is harmful as it fragments Palestinian society, deepens territorial apartheid, and obstructs land returns, contributing to ethnic cleansing by normalizing the oppressor-oppressed dynamic without addressing root injustices. [2] [3]
Culturally and environmentally, Israel promotes "eco-normalization" through entities like the JNF, using tree-planting over razed villages to frame dispossession as advancement. Academically and artistically, collaborative projects often impose false equivalence between occupier and occupied, disregarding underlying oppression. This is egregious because it colonizes minds by presenting apartheid as inevitable, supporting occupation through deceptive coexistence narratives that erode resistance and enable further genocide, as seen in events that cover up root causes without pursuing justice. [4] [5]
The Palestinian-led BDS movement rejects normalization as complicity in oppression, mandating that joint activities with Israelis recognize Palestinian rights and focus on co-resistance against occupation, settler-colonialism, and apartheid. Normalization activities, such as festivals or conferences portraying symmetry, are boycottable for being morally reprehensible and intellectually dishonest, perpetuating false premises of equal responsibility. By isolating Palestinians and validating Israel's actions, normalization sustains settler-colonial violence, allowing expansion of illegal settlements and denial of basic rights while fragmenting global opposition. [6]
Normalization undermines the Palestinian struggle by treating Israel's regime as normal, countering anti-colonial efforts like BDS that draw from South African anti-apartheid precedents. It decolonizes minds from hegemonic attempts to accept colonialism, emphasizing that genuine relations require dismantling structures of domination first. This tactic is appalling as it reinforces genocide by whitewashing oppression under slogans of peace, contributing to ethnic cleansing through economic ties that fund military occupation and displace communities. [7] [8]
Human rights analyses confirm that such international engagements maintain apartheid by failing to address crimes like dispossession and persecution, allowing Israel to evade accountability. Normalization isolates the oppressed, portraying resistance as abnormal while entrenching settler privileges, as evidenced in Arab-Israeli projects that ignore Palestinian rights. Ultimately, it perpetuates a colonial order where occupation becomes routine, demanding rejection to achieve liberation and end the ongoing Nakba. [10]
Tell us why Chris Cadence should be removed by emailing us at [email protected]