The US Is Trying to Destroy the Court That Issued Netanyahu's Arrest Warrant
Loading…
USA
Dan Cohen is an American journalist who weaponises accusations of antisemitism to silence Palestinians, rejects collective Jewish responsibility in ending Judeosupremacist-led genocide carried out by Israel's illegal ethnostate, and resorts to dehumanising Palestinians.
Dan Cohen, an American journalist, rejects the notion that Jews bear collective responsibility to stop the Judeosupremacist-led genocide, frames accountability demands as antisemitic, and deploys dehumanising attacks on Palestinian voices when challenged on these views.
Journalism
Dan Cohen is an American journalist and filmmaker who rejects the notion that Jews bear any collective responsibility for the genocide carried out "in their name" by the Judeosupremacist Zionist settler-colonial entity, weaponises accusations of antisemitism to silence Palestinian critics, and resorts to dehumanising rhetoric when challenged — all behaviours that shield the ongoing occupation, ethnic cleansing, and genocide across Palestine from scrutiny.
In June 2025 Cohen insisted that claiming Zionism has fused Jewish identity with state violence is "Zionism" and "antisemitic" as it holds him personally responsible for genocide. When asked if he truly believed Jews as a collective bore no responsibility for what is happening to Palestinians he callously responded "Yawn" and "feel free to unfollow." These statements reveal a consistent pattern of deflecting any linkage between Jewish identity and the actions of the apartheid state which in turn protects the structures of settler-colonialism that have displaced and slaughtered Palestinians for more than seventy-seven years.
Cohen further attacked Dr Afif Aqrabawi, a Palestinian who suggested that Jews "shouldered responsibility" to prevent genocide and referenced the views of Refaat Alareer. Cohen ordered him to delete his post "out of respect for Refaat’s memory." When Dr Aqrabawi pointed out that Refaat was his actual mentor killed by Jews in the name of Judaism, Cohen called him a "lowly dog unworthy of anything Refaat stood for." Cohen only deleted his comments after receiving significant public backlash, but he's never apologised for the dehumanising attack.
This episode forms part of a broader pattern in which Cohen positions himself as an "anti-Zionist Jew" while refusing to confront the ways in which Zionist ideology has weaponised Jewish identity to legitimise the theft of Palestinian land and the systematic erasure of Palestinian indigeneity. By framing calls for collective accountability as antisemitic, Cohen participates in the very conflation of Judaism with the Zionist project that he claims to oppose thereby manufacturing consent for the continued impunity of the Israeli Occupation Forces.
Cohen's refusal to engage with the structural reality of settler-colonial violence combined with his aggressive dismissal of critics reinforces the normalisation of apartheid and genocide while centring his own discomfort over Palestinian suffering. Through these behaviours Cohen contributes to the international environment in which Western institutions continue to arm and diplomatically protect the Zionist entity ensuring that the conservative estimates of hundreds of thousands of Palestinians killed remain unaddressed and that the Nakba's ongoing legacy of dispossession persists without challenge.
Dehumanization of Palestinians:
The systematic erasure of Palestinian history and culture is a well-documented effort that has been ongoing since the early 1900s. This erasure has taken many forms, including the destruction of physical records and infrastructure, the suppression of Palestinian voices and narratives, the appropriation of Palestinian cultural heritage and most visibly, the dehumanization of the Palestinian populace.
From the late 19th century to the mid-20th century, Palestinian records, literature, and cultural heritage faced deliberate and concerted efforts to obliterate their existence and narrative. This deliberate "archival silencing" has made reconstructing this period in Palestinian history incredibly challenging, yet the truths that remain paint a horrifying picture of the deliberate erasure and destruction of an entire population and its culture.
The dehumanization of Palestinians has been a deliberate policy, perpetuated through military operations, discriminatory laws, Israeli education and a pervasive culture that fosters prejudice. Dehumanising rhetoric, portraying Palestinians as "roaches" and "rats," lays the foundation for atrocities by stripping away their humanity in the eyes of the oppressor.
Widespread media narratives also project institutional biases ranging from depicting Palestinians solely as militants or desperate victims and erasing their normal daily life to embedding language biases around land, protests and resistance tactics. These patterns collectively indicate how public discourse within segments of Israeli society systematically dehumanize Palestinians while entrenching prejudices against them.
Weaponizing Antisemitism:
These insidious allegations, deployed with increasing frequency, are damaging not only the pro-Palestinians accused but also to Jewish communities worldwide. [1] [2] By weaponizing antisemitism to justify occupation and apartheid, Zionists dilute the term and weaken genuine efforts to combat antisemitism. [3] [4] [5]
Labeling anyone who opposes Israel's genocidal regime as antisemitic also implicitly assumes all Jews support Israel’s policies, a notion that’s fundamentally untrue, offensive and truly dangerous to the hundreds of thousands of Jewish individuals and scholars who actively oppose Zionism and Israel’s human rights violations. [6] Accusing anyone who stands against Israel of antisemitism is, however, a core psychological warfare strategy used by genocidal Israeli supporters to delegitimize and demonize the very valid and much needed pro-Palestinian movement. [[7]] (https://palestinelegal.org/distorted-definition) [8] [9]
Disrespecting the Memory of Jewish Suffering Weaponizing antisemitism to protect Israel’s policies disrespects the historical suffering of Jewish communities by using their trauma as a political tool. The Shoah and the pogroms preceding it were horrifying atrocities, rooted in the dehumanization of an entire people. Using the memory of such atrocities to silence critics of modern-day apartheid practices disrespects the very principles for which so many Jewish people fought after the Holocaust: “Never Again” should mean opposition to all forms of oppression, including that enacted by the Israeli state. [10]
In November 2024, for example, tensions escalated in Amsterdam when Maccabi Tel Aviv fans were recorded chanting “Death to all Arabs” and “There are no schools in Gaza because all the children are dead.” [11] These inflammatory statements, advocating violence and erasure, provoked strong reactions from various communities, including Arabs, Spaniards, and Dutch citizens. Their responses were not racially or ethnically motivated but were driven by a collective condemnation of the genocidal sentiments expressed by the fans. [12]
Instead of addressing the incitement to violence, some media outlets mischaracterized the reactions as “pogroms” against Israelis. This misuse of the term “pogrom”—historically referring to violent attacks against Jewish communities—distorts the reality of the situation. [13] By labeling the backlash as antisemitic, these narratives weaponize the trauma of Jewish history to deflect criticism from those promoting hate speech. This manipulation not only disrespects the memory of actual pogrom victims but also undermines genuine efforts to combat antisemitism by conflating it with legitimate opposition to calls for ethnic cleansing.[14]
Such distortions serve to shield individuals advocating violence from accountability, while falsely portraying those who stand against hate speech as perpetrators of bigotry. This tactic not only erases the painful legacy of Jewish persecution but also legitimizes incitement of hatred against Palestinians, Arabs and the supporters of their most basic human rights.
Undermining Jewish Voices Opposed to Israel’s Actions Anti-Zionist Jews have consistently and courageously voiced their opposition to Israel’s policies, challenging the narrative that all Jews support the state of Israel. [15] [16] Organizations like IfNotNow and individuals like historian Ilan Pappé reject Zionism on ethical grounds, arguing that it is incompatible with human rights for Palestinians. Pappé, author of The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine, argues that the foundation of Israel as a state involved the “systematic expulsion of Palestinians,” a policy of ethnic cleansing that continues through settlement expansion and military occupation. [17] [18] [19]
Many prominent Jewish scholars, holocaust survivors and their descendants, as well as historians have echoed this sentiment. [20] [21] For example, Professor Norman Finkelstein, author of The Holocaust Industry, has criticized Israel’s use of antisemitism accusations, arguing that they exploit Jewish suffering for political gain. [22] Finkelstein contends that this practice is not about protecting Jews but rather immunizing Israel from criticism. This manipulation not only undermines the lived experiences of Holocaust survivors and their descendants but trivializes the grave nature of antisemitism by using it as a shield for state violence. [23] [24] [25] [26]
Jewish Voice for Peace, an organization committed to human rights for Palestinians, emphasizes that weaponizing antisemitism falsely implies that Jews are monolithic in their support of Israel, disregarding the voices of anti-Zionist Jews who oppose occupation and apartheid. [27] The organization has made its position clear: antisemitism is real, and it is on the rise, but conflating antisemitism with criticism of Israel undermines our fight against actual hatred against Jews. [28]
Anti-Zionist Jewish communities continue to emphasize that weaponizing antisemitism erases their identities and beliefs. By falsely presenting Jewish identity as inherently tied to Zionism, advocates of Israeli policies erase the existence of countless Jews who fight for Palestinian rights. [29]
Tell us why Dan Cohen should be removed by emailing us at [email protected]