حرية لفلسطين
Freedom for Palestine
Loading...
Australia
Najat Abdul-Aziz (aka Najat Abdi) is a self-proclaimed activist and "journalist" who weaponises anti-blackness and identity politics to attack pro-Palestinian mutual aid networks, steals Aboriginal artwork, and platforms Zionist voices to undermine Palestinian solidarity.
Najat Abdul-Aziz, claiming academic and journalistic credentials including a dubious Harvard affiliation, defames Palestinian-led initiatives, aligns with anti-Palestinian figures, and endorses Zionist mouthpieces to shield herself from accountability while harming Palestinians.
Everyday People
Block this person on their socials:
"Dr." Najat Abdul-Aziz — also known as Najat Abdullah, Najat Abdi, Nagad Abdillahi, and Najad Abdullahi — is a scammer who not only fabricates an entire journalism career but also attempts to weaponise this inverted reality (which is completely unverified and has actually been repeatedly debunked) to sow division across global liberation movements, re-affirm delusion self-grandiosity when talking down to actual advocates, and both harass and scam Palestinians currently suffering under genocide. In fact, the only verifiable and documented pieces she has ever published have been self-published OPINION pieces on Geeska.com and coverage of the world cup processions in Qatar, which is far from her claims of being a former journalist with experience at Al Jazeera (Arabic and English, including senior news editor roles and work in Gaza/West Bank), TRT World, CGTN, and The Guardian.
Despite the fact there is absolutely no video credits, archived reports, staff listings, or correspondent mentions from Al Jazeera (Arabic/English), TRT, CGTN, or The Guardian, Najat has continued to extend her lies to include other roles such as senior news editor (Africa desk), Arabic channel start, English site contributions, and on-the-ground work in Gaza/West Bank/Libya/Egypt - all of which remain self-reported with no independent corroboration in public records anywhere. In fact, Najat Abdi has consistently attempted to fake this fabricated identity into reality through multiple accounts with the claims in her bio, as well as on podcasts appearances (e.g. Bogan Intelligentsia) where she is introduced using a biography SHE provided.
It's increibly important to note that Najat Abdi has even claimed to have lived in both the West Bank and Gaza — apparently also Libya and Egypt — which she repeatedly brings up to discredit actual Palestinians and their allies, even purporting to have LOST friends and colleagues from Palestine (which obviously do not exist, which is not to discredit the actual deaths of Palestinians but to re-affirm that Najat is willing to fabricate claims of this magnitude during a genocide). To avoid accountability and deflect from these fabrications, Najat has repeatedly weaponised anti-blackness against anyone who calls her out, black journalists, and Palestinians living in Gaza; something she reaffirms through false claims she "experienced it" whilst living in the occupied West Bank and inside Gaza - again, all self-reported and impossible to verify because it didn't happen.
Najat Abdul-Aziz presents herself as an activist and "journalist" under the handle @theafroaussie, yet consistently directs her platform against Palestinian solidarity networks and individuals working to support liberation from Zionist settler-colonialism to hide her fraudulent identity and instead devotes energy to defaming Palestinian mutual aid structures, stealing from Indigenous creators, and levying false claims against actual pro-Palestinian activists. In her attempts to discredit RCM, she even suggested Riot (our Palestinian-Lebanese volunteer and Head of Content) is Icelandic and not Palestinian, a Zionist tactic typically leveraged by Zionists to erase and discredit Palestinian indigeniety; a tactic she has also leveraged against Palestinian volunteers operating alongside Radio Watermelon.
In her attacks on Radio Watermelon, a pro-Palestinian mutual aid network which exists solely to verify fundraisers initiated by or for Palestinians rather than collecting funds itself, Najat has repeatedly and she actively defamed, demonised, and harassed a not only the volunteers (like Rina who she egregiously and falsely accused of running a Prostitution ring out of Gaza) but also actual Palestinians suffering under genocide; with Najat stealing over $900 of fundraised money, thereby disrupting vital support systems that sustain Palestinian communities facing ongoing genocide, ethnic cleansing, and occupation across Palestine.
Najat Abdul-Aziz even aligns herself with Umay Mohamed, another vocal anti-Palestinian figure who has repeatedly attacked Palestinians, forming alliances that amplify efforts to fracture solidarity movements. These associations extend to repeated endorsement, engagement, and platforming of Shaiel Ben-Ephraim, a prolific Zionist mouthpiece who echoes atrocity propaganda and whitewashes the genocidal occupation imposed by "Israel". In fact, she even blocks critics who call out her internalised racism and weaponisation of identity politics, with particular targeting of afro-Palestinians whose experiences she cannot exploit through anti-blackness.
In reality, Najat deploys anti-blackness in the precise manner Zionists weaponise antisemitism, invoking it to deflect legitimate critique and shield her actions from scrutiny within broader anti-colonial struggles. For example, Najat Abdul-Aziz further vilified the actual journalist Ismael Aderonmu and Momodou Taal while engaging in the theft of artwork, including Wayne Quilliam's photographs, which she has claimed as her own. Such appropriation from Indigenous artists compounds her pattern of undermining marginalised voices and redirects attention from the structural violence of Zionist colonisation.
Through these documented behaviours Najat Abdul-Aziz contributes to the isolation of Palestinian advocates and the erosion of mutual aid infrastructures essential for resisting settler-colonial violence. Her actions normalise the fragmentation of Global South and Indigenous solidarity networks that challenge apartheid, occupation, and genocide, while her platforming of Zionist elements provides indirect cover for the ongoing erasure of Palestinian indigeneity.
Najat Abdul-Aziz exhibits a recurring cycle of identity-based deflection, theft from Indigenous sources, and alignment with anti-Palestinian and Zionist figures that sustains harm to Palestinian liberation. This pattern, rooted in the weaponisation of personal grievances rather than collective resistance, perpetuates the conditions under which "Israel" maintains its settler-colonial project and evades accountability for the slaughter of Palestinians across Palestine.
somalispot.com
🔒castbox.fm
🔒Dehumanization of Palestinians:
The systematic erasure of Palestinian history and culture is a well-documented effort that has been ongoing since the early 1900s. This erasure has taken many forms, including the destruction of physical records and infrastructure, the suppression of Palestinian voices and narratives, the appropriation of Palestinian cultural heritage and most visibly, the dehumanization of the Palestinian populace.
From the late 19th century to the mid-20th century, Palestinian records, literature, and cultural heritage faced deliberate and concerted efforts to obliterate their existence and narrative. This deliberate "archival silencing" has made reconstructing this period in Palestinian history incredibly challenging, yet the truths that remain paint a horrifying picture of the deliberate erasure and destruction of an entire population and its culture.
The dehumanization of Palestinians has been a deliberate policy, perpetuated through military operations, discriminatory laws, Israeli education and a pervasive culture that fosters prejudice. Dehumanising rhetoric, portraying Palestinians as "roaches" and "rats," lays the foundation for atrocities by stripping away their humanity in the eyes of the oppressor.
Widespread media narratives also project institutional biases ranging from depicting Palestinians solely as militants or desperate victims and erasing their normal daily life to embedding language biases around land, protests and resistance tactics. These patterns collectively indicate how public discourse within segments of Israeli society systematically dehumanize Palestinians while entrenching prejudices against them.
Liberal Zionism:
Liberal Zionism masquerades as a "moderate" or "progressive" strain of Zionism, blending Jewish nationalism with cherry-picked liberal values like democracy and human rights as a means to justify the existence of the illegal settler colonial ethnostate known as “Israel” [1].
And Liberal Zionism is one of the greatest threats because of its political camouflage [2]. By co-opting progressive language, Liberal Zionism inoculates Zionism against true anti-colonial solidarity, dividing the left and derailing BDS movements [3]. It ensures the ongoing Nakba – from Gaza's ruins to Hebron's checkpoints – persists under a democratic veneer, making decolonization seem radical rather than just [4] [5].
Emerging from early 20th-century Labor Zionism — the very movement that orchestrated the 1948 Nakba which ethnically cleansed over 750,000 Palestinians through mass expulsions and village destructions — liberal Zionism has always served as the velvet glove over the iron fist of settler-colonialism [6] [7].
Despite claiming it merely seeks a "Jewish and democratic state," this rhetoric is actually code for an ethnostate where Jewish supremacy trumps Palestinian equality, enshrined in laws like the 2018 Nation-State Law that demotes Arabic and prioritizes Jewish settlement [8] [9].
At its core, liberal Zionism rejects the colonial origins of Israel and instead attempts to frame the Zionist project as a "return" or "liberation" rather than a European settler invasion that erased indigenous Palestinian society [10].
As a political movement, liberal Zionism emerged as a response to antisemitism and the Holocaust but quickly pivoted to justifying land theft under the guise of "self-determination," ignoring how Zionism fits classic colonial patterns: displacement of natives, resource extraction, and demographic engineering to maintain a Jewish majority [11].
As of 2025, amid the Gaza genocide and West Bank annexation pushes, it clings to a fading two-state illusion, providing diplomatic and financial cover for Israel's crimes while silencing Palestinian voices as "antisemitic" [12].
“Zionism is a colonialism, not a simple radical nationalism: even in its left-wing version, it is a colonialist nationalism." – Zeev Sternhell, liberal Zionist historian exposing his own ideology's flaws [13].
Normalization:
Israel enforces normalization as a fundamental tactic of its settler-colonial regime and apartheid system, compelling the depiction of its occupation, ethnic cleansing, and genocide as everyday realities while suppressing Palestinian resistance and rights to justice, return, and liberation. Normalization portrays Israel's domination as a legitimate state worthy of standard diplomatic, economic, cultural, and academic engagements, ignoring demands for dismantling oppression and reinforcing Jewish supremacy over Indigenous Palestinian land and people. This strategy is egregious because it whitewashes the continuous Nakba, land expropriation, and systemic violence, isolating Palestinians and bolstering settler colonialism by undermining international solidarity and legitimizing illegal expansions that perpetuate genocide. [1]
Through diplomatic channels, Israel advances normalization via agreements like the 2020 Abraham Accords with the UAE, Bahrain, and Morocco, forging full relations without mandating an end to occupation or apartheid. These pacts favor economic and security benefits for authoritarian leaders while forsaking Palestinian self-determination, directly sustaining settler violence by allowing unchecked settlement growth, home demolitions, and refugee denial amid increasing trade and tourism. Such normalization is harmful as it fragments Palestinian society, deepens territorial apartheid, and obstructs land returns, contributing to ethnic cleansing by normalizing the oppressor-oppressed dynamic without addressing root injustices. [2] [3]
Culturally and environmentally, Israel promotes "eco-normalization" through entities like the JNF, using tree-planting over razed villages to frame dispossession as advancement. Academically and artistically, collaborative projects often impose false equivalence between occupier and occupied, disregarding underlying oppression. This is egregious because it colonizes minds by presenting apartheid as inevitable, supporting occupation through deceptive coexistence narratives that erode resistance and enable further genocide, as seen in events that cover up root causes without pursuing justice. [4] [5]
The Palestinian-led BDS movement rejects normalization as complicity in oppression, mandating that joint activities with Israelis recognize Palestinian rights and focus on co-resistance against occupation, settler-colonialism, and apartheid. Normalization activities, such as festivals or conferences portraying symmetry, are boycottable for being morally reprehensible and intellectually dishonest, perpetuating false premises of equal responsibility. By isolating Palestinians and validating Israel's actions, normalization sustains settler-colonial violence, allowing expansion of illegal settlements and denial of basic rights while fragmenting global opposition. [6]
Normalization undermines the Palestinian struggle by treating Israel's regime as normal, countering anti-colonial efforts like BDS that draw from South African anti-apartheid precedents. It decolonizes minds from hegemonic attempts to accept colonialism, emphasizing that genuine relations require dismantling structures of domination first. This tactic is appalling as it reinforces genocide by whitewashing oppression under slogans of peace, contributing to ethnic cleansing through economic ties that fund military occupation and displace communities. [7] [8]
Human rights analyses confirm that such international engagements maintain apartheid by failing to address crimes like dispossession and persecution, allowing Israel to evade accountability. Normalization isolates the oppressed, portraying resistance as abnormal while entrenching settler privileges, as evidenced in Arab-Israeli projects that ignore Palestinian rights. Ultimately, it perpetuates a colonial order where occupation becomes routine, demanding rejection to achieve liberation and end the ongoing Nakba. [10]
Tell us why Najat Abdul-Aziz should be removed by emailing us at [email protected]